Asset Protection

Asset protection with Joint Tenancy, Tenancy in Common, Tenancy in Entirety & Community Property

Protecting assets by Joint Tenancy, Tenants in Common, Tenancy in Entirety or Community Property have many disadvantages.   PART 1: ASSET PROTECTION: JOINT TENANCY, TENANCY IN COMMON, TENANCY IN ENTIRETY & COMMUNITY PROPER…

Quick navigation

Jump to the section you need

Use these quick links to go straight to the answer, example, or planning point that matters most right now.

  1. PART 1: ASSET PROTECTION: JOINT TENANCY, TENANCY IN COMMON, TENANCY IN ENTIRETY & COMMUNITY PROPERTY
  2. JOINT TENANCY
  3. JOINT TENANCY WITH RIGHT OF SURVIVORSHIP
  4. TENANCY IN COMMON
  1. TENANCY BY THE ENTIRETY
  2. COMMUNITY PROPERTY
  3. Questions that usually come up next

Protecting assets by Joint Tenancy, Tenants in Common, Tenancy in Entirety or Community Property have many disadvantages.

 

PART 1: ASSET PROTECTION: JOINT TENANCY, TENANCY IN COMMON, TENANCY IN ENTIRETY & COMMUNITY PROPERTY

 

 

Watch the video on Asset protection with Joint Tenancy, Tenancy in Common, Tenancy in Entirety & Community Property
 
Like this video? Subscribe to our channel.
 
THE CONCEPT OF ASSET PROTECTION includes the possibility of placing title in certain assets in the name of a less vulnerable spouse or other family members, or a legal entity. One should be very attentive in transferring title without an open invitation to a “fraudulent transfer” claim against the asset transferred as a result of the possibility of death by the spouse or a family member, or the possibility of a dissolute marriage, or even a court judgment.
 
Fraudulent conveyance has to do with transferring assets at less than the “fair cash value” thereby defrauding a potential creditor or the intentional divesting of assets which become unavailable for satisfaction of a lawsuit. Fair cash value means cash or near cash value at the time of transfer, not the price you paid for the asset. Example: you transfer your portion of your equity in your home to your wife for $100.00 and the fair cash value of your portion of the equity was $250,000 or you transfer title to your car to your brother for $10.00.
 
The most common methods of holding assets by INDIVIDUALS:
 
  • Joint Tenancy
  • Joint Tenancy with right of survivorship
  • Tenants in Common
  • Tenancy by the Entirety
  • Community Property
LEGAL ENTITIES (Artificial person created by application of law):
  • General Partnership
  • Limited Partnership
  • Limited Liability Company
  • Corporation under Chapter “C”
  • Corporation under Sub Chapter “S”
  • Revocable Trust (There are many Revocable Trust variations, since a Trust is nothing more than a Contract)
  • Irrevocable Trust (There are many Irrevocable Trust variations, since a Trust is nothing more than a Contract)
 

JOINT TENANCY

 

In the United States Joint Tenancy is common for real estate, bank accounts, brokerage accounts, and other assets. Husband and wife are both named on the deed to their home. This is a very bad idea. In my opinion, anyone recommending Joint Tenancy is uninformed and is perhaps guilty of malpractice.
 
Disadvantages of holding title in Joint Tenancy:
 
  1. Loss of step-up in basis upon the death of the first Tenant. You bought the house for $100,000 some years later the cost basis is still $100,000 there’s no step-up in basis at the time of death.
  2. Loss of estate tax protection.
  3. Possible exposure of the assets to the creditor or the other Tenants. This is extremely and dangerously significant because any Tenant can transfer the asset to someone other than the other Joint Tenants WITHOUT PERMISSION from any of the Joint Tenants.
  4. Joint Tenancy disinherits all other heirs, except the remaining Joint Tenant.
  5. Possibility of a gift tax consequence may result from the transfer of property into Joint Tenancy.
  6. Title in Joint Tenancy supercedes any provisions of a will.
  7. Joint Tenancy supercedes any trust with the loss of all trust benefits.
Advantage of Joint Tenancy:
 
In small estates title of Joint Tenancy does avoid unnecessary delay and unnecessary cost of the probate process.
 

JOINT TENANCY WITH RIGHT OF SURVIVORSHIP

 

Joint Tenants automatically inherit the property. There are six characteristics:
  1. Each Tenant acquired or was vested with the title at the same time.
  2. Each Tenant acquired title by the same instrument or deed, or action.
  3. Each Tenant owns an equal and undivided interest.
  4. Each Tenant has the right to possess the “whole” property (dangerous in cases of frivolous litigation).
  5. Each Tenant has the right to survivorship.
  6. Interest may not be transferred by will.

 

TENANCY IN COMMON

 

Tenancy in Common has the following characteristics:
  1. Separate but undivided interest in the property. (Each Tenant has his own deed/title to his share).
  2. Ownership interest in the property may be varying in proportions (Fractional shares i.e. 1/3, 1/2).
  3. Interest in the property may be transferred by will.
  4. All tenants have equal right to possession.

 

The risk of separate ownership is the risk. In cases where there are multiple owners, it’s difficult to have a consensus opinion acting as one without the risk of diverse opinions. Section 1031 like exchange of real estate as a Tenant In Common is widely used to transfer property Tax-free.
 

TENANCY BY THE ENTIRETY

 

A special kind of title between married couples, meaning that each spouse has the right to enjoy the underlying property by the entirety and when one of the spouses dies, the other inherits the property by the entirety. Tenancy by the Entirety has the following characteristics:
  1. Tenancy by the Entirety may only be created by Husband and Wife.
  2. Tenancy by the Entirety offers the right of survivorship.
  3. Neither spouse may transfer or convey title to a third person without consent of the spouse.
  4. Title converts to Tenancy in Common upon divorce.

 

COMMUNITY PROPERTY

 

Title to property deemed to be owned together by both spouses regardless of who purchased the asset until separation or divorce. The major characteristics of holding title by Community Property are basically governed by Community Property states in which the spouses are domiciled during the marriage. As a general rule, most property acquired by either spouse during the marriage and while domiciled in the community property state is deemed to be community property and owned jointly by each spouse. Generally there are a few exceptions, but you need to consult with each Community State:
  1. Property received by one spouse through gift or inheritance.
  2. Property received through separate property owned by the spouse outside the community property rules, i.e. rents on separate investment real estate.
  3. Through ownership by some other legal entity:
    1. Partnership
    2. Trust
    3. Corporation
    4. Limited Liability Company

 

Community states are:
  • Arizona
  • California
  • Idaho
  • Louisiana
  • Nevada
  • New Mexico
  • Texas
  • Washington State
  • Wisconsin

 

To learn more about how you can use an irrevocable trusts and discuss joint tenancy, co-ownership of assets, revocable living trusts and create a solid asset protection system call Estate Street Partners 888-93-ULTRA (888-938-5872).

Helpful resources: Readers often continue with Asset Protection Trust, Revocable vs Irrevocable Trust, and official IRS estate and gift tax guidance for broader context on the planning choices involved.

Questions that usually come up next

People exploring Asset protection with Joint Tenancy, Tenancy in Common, Tenancy in Entirety & Community Property often move next to the practical questions: when to act, what to fund, and how much control can stay with the original owner.

Details that often change the outcome

  • Timing matters because planning choices usually become narrower once a problem is already close.
  • Control matters because the answer often depends on how much access or authority the owner wants to keep.
  • Funding matters because a trust or entity has to be set up and maintained correctly to matter.

What usually helps after the main answer

Many readers narrow the decision by comparing Asset Protection Trust, Irrevocable Trust, and How It Works. When the question turns from reading to implementation, many readers move from these guides to a direct planning conversation.

Related resources

After reading Asset protection with Joint Tenancy, Tenancy in Common, Tenancy in Entirety & Community Property, most readers want a clearer next step: which structure answers the same problem, what timing changes the result, and where the practical follow-up questions usually lead.

What people compare next

The next question is usually not abstract. It is whether a trust, an entity, or a different planning step does the real job better in your situation.

What often changes the answer

Timing, ownership, funding, and how much control you want to keep usually matter more than labels alone.

When a conversation helps more

Once structure, timing, and next steps start intersecting, it usually helps to talk through the options in the right order.

Explore Asset Protection

Review the main introduction to asset protection planning and the core decisions that shape a stronger structure.

Explore Asset Protection Trust

See how trust-based planning is used to protect wealth, organize control, and support long-term decisions.

Explore Irrevocable Trust

Understand how irrevocable trust planning works, when people use it, and what tradeoffs usually matter most.

Explore How It Works

Follow the planning process from consultation through drafting, funding, and the next practical steps.

Explore Ebook

Download the guide for a longer walkthrough you can read at your own pace and revisit later.

Explore Main Blog

Browse more practical articles, comparisons, and next-step guidance across the full UltraTrust blog.

What people usually compare next

Most readers compare structure, timing, control, and the practical next step after narrowing the issue in the article above.

What usually makes the answer more specific

Actual ownership, funding, current exposure, and how much control someone wants to keep usually matter more than labels in isolation.

When another step helps more than another article

Once timing, structure, and next steps start overlapping, it often helps to talk through the sequence instead of trying to compare everything mentally.

Questions readers usually ask next

Clear answers make it easier to compare structure, timing, control, and the next step that fits best.

What usually matters most before moving ahead with a trust-based protection plan?

Most people get the clearest answer by looking at timing, current ownership, funding, and how much control they want to keep. Those points usually shape the next step more than labels alone.

How do readers usually decide which related page to read next?

Most readers move next to the page that answers the practical question left open after the article, whether that is lawsuit exposure, business-owner risk, trust structure, cost, or how the process works.

When does it help to compare more than one structure instead of stopping with one article?

It usually helps as soon as the decision involves more than one concern at the same time, such as protection, control, taxes, family planning, or business exposure. That is when side-by-side comparison becomes more useful than reading in isolation.

What makes the next step feel more practical and less theoretical?

The next step feels more practical once the discussion turns to actual assets, ownership, timing, and the sequence of decisions that would need to happen in real life.

Ready to take the next step?

Get clear guidance on trust structure, planning priorities, and the next move that fits your assets and goals.