Asset Protection

Asset Protection Strategy Consideration

  Our Asset Protection System   Asset Protection: Part 2 of 4, by Rocco Beatrice, Sr.   You see the writing on the wall.   You're not certain if this litigation is going to begin in…

Quick navigation

Jump to the section you need

Use these quick links to go straight to the answer, example, or planning point that matters most right now.

  1. Asset Protection: Part 2 of 4, by Rocco Beatrice, Sr.
  2. Questions that usually come up next
  1. Common questions about this article

 

bolt nut Asset Protection of UltraTrust
Our Asset Protection System
 

Asset Protection: Part 2 of 4, by Rocco Beatrice, Sr.

 

You see the writing on the wall.
 
You’re not certain if this litigation is going to begin in a month, six months, or year; but you definitely feel the stress related to it. The thought is consuming and dominating your daily life. If you have never gone through this nightmare, I can tell you: … IT’S EXHAUSTING.
 
Our Asset Protection System is financially engineered to protect</> your wealth against unscrupulous lawyers, internet prying eyes about you, your family, your finances, scam artists, identity thieves, and other con-artists, and “I’m from the Government and I’m here to help you.”
 
90% of the time asset protection gets dismantled due to fraudulent conveyance</>
 
Regardless of what structure that you use, whether it be a limited partnership (LP), a family limited partnership (FLP), a domestic Limited Liability Company (LLC), a domestic corporation, a domestic Sub S corporation, a domestic trust, or even an offshore trust, if the judge sees that your transfers were without fair market consideration</> (i.e. you never got paid a fair price for them when you gave them away), they can be clawed back by the court.
 
Man with head in sand because he won't deal with the problem of protecting his assets.
Something this stressful gets some people so overwhelmed with fear and anxiety that it causes them an inability to take action. They think that if they keep pushing it aside, and bury their head in the sand, that the problem is somehow going to go away on its own.
 
This is exactly what happened to someone that called us a last year, but it happens at least once every year. Mike originally reached out to us at a time that there was a high risk of a court battle coming, but nothing was set in stone yet. Because he hadn’t actually been served papers indicating that he’s been sued, he thought there might be a chance that there may never be a lawsuit, so he decided to hold off taking action to avoid the cost.
 
A few months later from our phone call he found out through a series of checks that bounced that his bank accounts were frozen. The creditor got a preliminary judgment and brought it to his bank, freezing the accounts without even his knowledge.
 
At that point, not only was there nothing that anyone could do, but he couldn’t even access funds to retain a defense attorney because all of his money was frozen.
 

You don’t have to go through what Mike went through.

 
BUT… I’m sure you’re thinking, “well, by using an offshore trust, the judge doesn’t have any jurisdiction, so a ‘judgment’ is not executable and It’ll be fine” and you’d be partially right… except for one small detail:
 
1. Offshore trusts typically cost $5-10,000 a year to maintain
2. If you have committed a fraudulent conveyance, most judges now put you in jail until you comply with a court order to bring the money back into the United States.
 

Offshore trusts for real estate work even less well:

 
Real estate that is physically located in a state that the court does have jurisdiction (even if the property is owned by an offshore trust), can be unwound if it is found that you gave up the asset without getting anything for it.
 
And while setting up a structure and transferring assets into it well before a problem arises is the best advice, the issue of “fraudulent conveyance” still will come up because there is a 4-5-year statute of limitations for any transfer if you do not get paid for it.
 
This means that, even if you take action before a lawsuit happens, but less than four – five years from the transfer of the assets, you could still be at risk of a fraudulent conveyance claim. So, if you take the wrong advice, you could lose more than “just money, you could be held civilly and criminally liable” taking advice from every 3rd lawyer who claims to be “the Asset Protection Expert.” Most lawyers use the “gifting method” to transfer assets. “GIFTING” is a Fraudulent Conveyance.
 
Under the Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act you would be committing a crime, see Section 19.40.041
 
… (a) a transfer made or obligation incurred by a debtor is fraudulent as to a creditor whether the creditor’s claim arose before or after the transfer was made or the obligation was incurred, if the debtor made the transfer or incurred the obligation: (1) with actual intent to hinder, delay, or defraud any creditor of the debtor.”…
Your lawyer could also be held liable, and possibly lose his license under the theory for civil conspiracy:
 
The “civil conspiracy theory” has been defined by the courts as (1) an agreement (2) by two or more persons (3) to perform overt act(s) (4) in furtherance of the agreement or conspiracy (5) to accomplish an unlawful purpose or a lawful purpose by unlawful means (6) causing injury to another.
 
Read part 1 of 4: Asset Protection Strategy
 
Read part 3 of 4: Irrevocable Trust Structure
 

Helpful resources: Helpful next steps often include Asset Protection Trust, Revocable vs Irrevocable Trust, and official IRS estate and gift tax guidance when weighing practical next steps.

Questions that usually come up next

People exploring Asset Protection Strategy Consideration often move next to the practical questions: when to act, what to fund, and how much control can stay with the original owner.

Details that often change the outcome

  • Timing matters because planning choices usually become narrower once a problem is already close.
  • Control matters because the answer often depends on how much access or authority the owner wants to keep.
  • Funding matters because a trust or entity has to be set up and maintained correctly to matter.

What usually helps after the main answer

Many readers narrow the decision by comparing Asset Protection Trust, Irrevocable Trust, and How It Works. When the question turns from reading to implementation, many readers move from these guides to a direct planning conversation.

Answers that help

Common questions about this article

These answers summarize the topic in plain English so readers can move from the article into the next practical planning page.

What is the main takeaway from "Asset Protection Strategy Consideration"?

  Our Asset Protection System   Asset Protection: Part 2 of 4, by Rocco Beatrice, Sr.   You see the writing on the wall.   You're not certain… The article is meant to give readers a practical understanding of the issue so they can connect the topic to planning decisions instead of treating it as an isolated legal phrase.

Who should read this article?

This article is usually most useful for readers who are trying to understand asset protection strategy consideration before making a trust, ownership, or asset protection decision and want a clearer explanation in everyday language.

Why does this topic matter in broader planning?

Topics like this matter because one misunderstood issue can change how readers think about timing, control, funding, or exposure. Articles like this help turn a broad concern into a more focused next step.

What should readers compare after finishing this article?

Most readers go next to a related trust page, a comparison page, or another article in the same category so they can test the idea against a larger planning framework before deciding what to do next.

Related resources

After reading Asset Protection Strategy Consideration, most readers want a clearer next step: which structure answers the same problem, what timing changes the result, and where the practical follow-up questions usually lead.

What people compare next

The next question is usually not abstract. It is whether a trust, an entity, or a different planning step does the real job better in your situation.

What often changes the answer

Timing, ownership, funding, and how much control you want to keep usually matter more than labels alone.

When a conversation helps more

Once structure, timing, and next steps start intersecting, it usually helps to talk through the options in the right order.

Explore Asset Protection

Review the main introduction to asset protection planning and the core decisions that shape a stronger structure.

Explore Asset Protection Trust

See how trust-based planning is used to protect wealth, organize control, and support long-term decisions.

Explore Irrevocable Trust

Understand how irrevocable trust planning works, when people use it, and what tradeoffs usually matter most.

Explore How It Works

Follow the planning process from consultation through drafting, funding, and the next practical steps.

Explore Ebook

Download the guide for a longer walkthrough you can read at your own pace and revisit later.

Explore Main Blog

Browse more practical articles, comparisons, and next-step guidance across the full UltraTrust blog.

What people usually compare next

Most readers compare structure, timing, control, and the practical next step after narrowing the issue in the article above.

What usually makes the answer more specific

Actual ownership, funding, current exposure, and how much control someone wants to keep usually matter more than labels in isolation.

When another step helps more than another article

Once timing, structure, and next steps start overlapping, it often helps to talk through the sequence instead of trying to compare everything mentally.

Questions readers usually ask next

Clear answers make it easier to compare structure, timing, control, and the next step that fits best.

What usually matters most before moving ahead with a trust-based protection plan?

Most people get the clearest answer by looking at timing, current ownership, funding, and how much control they want to keep. Those points usually shape the next step more than labels alone.

How do readers usually decide which related page to read next?

Most readers move next to the page that answers the practical question left open after the article, whether that is lawsuit exposure, business-owner risk, trust structure, cost, or how the process works.

When does it help to compare more than one structure instead of stopping with one article?

It usually helps as soon as the decision involves more than one concern at the same time, such as protection, control, taxes, family planning, or business exposure. That is when side-by-side comparison becomes more useful than reading in isolation.

What makes the next step feel more practical and less theoretical?

The next step feels more practical once the discussion turns to actual assets, ownership, timing, and the sequence of decisions that would need to happen in real life.

Ready to take the next step?

Get clear guidance on trust structure, planning priorities, and the next move that fits your assets and goals.